Starting from the top, the layout is the same as the previous SKY03 goggles. Mine is the unique camouflage which really stands out from the the crowd. However it does come with a huge range of colors and skins options. The Skyzone SKY03O has a glossy finish, but still feels kind of plasticky like the previous releases.
ORQA FPV GOGGLES FULL
Here is a full list of specifications and features for the Skyzone SKY03O FPV goggles. Anyway you can still fly 16:9 FPV cameras with it, but the image will just look a bit squashed. Most cameras can switch between 16:9 and 4:3 in the settings. 16:9 OLED panels can easily do 4:3 by leaving black strips on the left and right sides of the screen, but for some reasons it’s not that straightforward with the 4:3.Īs far as I know most people fly 4:3 cameras these days because it’s the best aspect ratio for FPV – as the wider vertical FOV helps flying fast more than horizontal FOV. According to Skyzone, this is a hardware limitation with the 4:3 panels. The SKY03O doesn’t support 16:9 aspect ratio at the moment, and I don’t think it ever will. You might find this FPV goggles FOV comparison tool useful. If you are happy with HDO’s FOV you should be fine with SKY03O’s. Honestly when I was testing the HDO and 03O back to back, I didn’t even notice the FOV difference, they looked about the same screen size. Anyway, I don’t get any blurry edges with the new SKY03O, the whole screen is crystal clear for me. That could have been the reason why Skyzone brought down the FOV (or it could be a display limitation). And that’s exactly the problem I had with the previous SKY03 goggles. Some people probably are shaking their heads right now at the 35° field of view (FOV), but I am not.Īs I mentioned in my HDO review, when you have wider FOV, you will very likely get blurry edges.
Video can’t be loaded because JavaScript is disabled: Skyzone SKY03O VS Fatshark HDO OLED Display Comparison () Is 35° FOV Too Small? I don’t know much that has affected the test, but I did my best to make sure the test was fair and hopefully this is useful. The Fatshark HDO I have is nearly 2 years old, and the SKY03O is brand new. I spent a long time trying to record the screens so I can show you the difference in a more objective way other than just words. To keep it brief, the SKY03O image has higher contrast and shows the detail better than the HDO, I guess the higher resolution isn’t a lie. The screens are actually different too.Īlthough they are both OLED panels, the Skyzone appears to edge out the HDO which I didn’t expect. The difference doesn’t stop there between the HDO and SKY03O. I am glad there is finally some competition in the market, and there are so many things the SKY03O is doing better than the HDO. After using them for nearly 2 years now, I don’t think I would ever go back to the old LCD screens. See my HDO review for more info on that.įatshark was the first to introduce OLED panels to FPV Goggles and I am one of the first to try them.
ORQA FPV GOGGLES 720P
** HDO is supposed to support 1080p with HDMI input, but in my testing I can only get 720p to work. You can see my full review of the HDO here. Since the Orqa is not released yet (and honestly it’s way beyond my budget), I will only compare between the SKY03O and HDO in this review. There are currently three OLED goggles in the FPV space, Fatshark HDO, Skyzone SKY03O and Orqa FPV.ONE. Where to Buy SKY03O FPV Goggles?Īccording to BG’s site, they are currently offering a discount for pre-orders.Īvailable in lots of colors and skins: White, Black, Red, Camouflage, Diamond Midnight Blue, Vagary Ice Blue, Amber, Super Glossy Metallic Orange, Super Glossy Metallic Black Rose There are a lot of technical terms used in this review, if you are new, please take a look at my FPV goggles buyer’s guide to learn all the basics first. They basically took the SKY03S and upgraded the screens to OLED, hence the letter O at the end. Lower IPD? Power button? 4S and 6S LiPo compatibility? OSD menu? Battery voltage monitoring? Fan speed control? Display adjustments on hue, saturation and sharpness? Fatshark doesn’t have any of these, but the cheaper Skyzone has managed it all with the SKY03O!ĭon’t get me wrong, I love Fatshark, I want to see them succeed, but frankly their development has been too slow and I don’t see much innovation in their new goggles.īy the way, it’s SKY03O – Zero Three O, not o3o or o30.
I am extremely excited about this new OLED FPV goggles from Skyzone.
0 kommentar(er)
